But is it Art?

23 min read

Deviation Actions

hq's avatar
hq
By
Published:
32.5K Views
'Wall Of Gum' by techgnotic









Perhaps the eternally unanswerable question. But definitely something to chew on... When I first saw it, I was instantly captivated.


At first thought, what a brilliant example of modern pointillism! Has some unknown artist taken up the long abandoned banner of Georges Seurat and presented us with a new manifesto championing art as points of light illuminating our waking dreams?!







Gum Wall in Seattle
by Paul Balcerak


OK, I see now it’s not a painting at all, so my pointillism exuberance is dashed. It’s more likely one of those photo collages with thousands of small images being arranged to create a larger picture. That’s cool. So what’s the picture?


If I stare intently long enough, will it suddenly “emerge,” like the ones they sell on the Venice Beach Boardwalk?


OK... it’s gum.












Chewing Gum Wall
by Ricardo Martins








But, hold on.

It is definitely eye-catching.







And it has definitely held my attention and stirred my consciousness long enough to force the gears in my head to grind out some “answer” as to how I feel about it. And the brief cerebral adventure sparked by this “work” has brought a bit of fun, a flash of joy, into my heart. Why, I actually think it’s a fine example of performance art, even if only a few of the “artists” involved ever gave a moment’s thought as to where, for best aesthetic impact, they would stick their plug of gum. “Unconscious Group Performance Art (UGPA).”(!!!) An artwork years, perhaps decades, in the making!


In any case, it made me think and wonder. It made me feel (happy). So, it’s art to me, even if it’s just saliva-soaked vandalism to someone else. And isn’t that what the wonder of life and art is really all about?


I pose the question back onto you.

Is this art?


Btw, speaking of pointillism, here is a list of 10 deviants that have some wonderful examples of the artform in their galleries.


:iconwolffoxin: :iconkchan27: :iconpikajane: :iconsamuraijose: :iconmasterofpointillism: :icondoxie18: :iconarmandoartist: :iconscorpioshadow: :iconxlxbetoxlx: :iconletocallisto:







Since Posting My Thoughts on “The Wall of Gum”


A remarkable number of deviants have responded with their own observations on this “artwork,” pointing out elements for “consideration as art” that I hadn’t even thought of while recording my initial assessment. These included: the question of intention and/or purpose of the artist(s), the effects of time and weather on the piece, and even the architecture of the gummed-upon structure as fundamental to its essence. I hope that by reading these awesomely perspicacious first responses, posted below, more deviants will be encouraged to weigh in with your own unique insights. The Wall of Gum demands that attention must be paid!


Here is a small sampling of deviants who have already contributed mightily to the conversation in the thread below. Please share your thoughts with them regarding their opinions or provide us with a completely new take on the question, "but is it art?"


:iconmetellastella: :iconfullmetalmono: :iconjackqajacqueline: :icontelephonicchicken: :iconlostatseaforever: :icondorianstretton: :iconsidequestpubs: :iconmattsykun: :iconjantuts: :iconniallcloud: :iconquargranger: :iconschatten-drache: :icongryphonsshadow: :iconeli-arsnexus: :icondozalt: :iconericforfriends: :iconartisticaviary: :iconsophiadragonmaster: :iconartandattitude: :iconleucisticraccoon: :iconcarlzors: :iconjeysie: :iconkaydeidrickphoto: :iconvoidqueenelishiva: :iconxadrea: :iconshedsimas: :iconkitsune100percent: :iconultradudepatric: :iconmidnightexigent: :iconiurypadilha: :iconsandpaperdaisy: :iconcreevesabudd: :iconnokari: :iconforgetdeny:







© 2011 - 2024 hq
Comments19428
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
SebbyChanArt's avatar

In my opinion anything that is made by humans that require some degree of creativity and coming up with an idea is art and design. It can be paintings, drawings, sculptures, photos, architecture, furniture, fashion or other kinds of mediums. Music, books and food are also a form of art because of it require coming up with an idea and execute it. It doesn't matter if one likes it or not and if it's high or low quality, as long it's a man made idea. I think good and bad art can exist like how good and bad entertainment can exist. In each categories there will always be certain things one will appreciate more than others.


I likes when an artist puts effort and time into their artworks. To me meaning, a story, aesthetics and skill are important to be able to enjoy an art piece. That's the reason why I love many of the classical and traditional art pieces. I appreciate the classics like Rembrandt, Caravaggio and Leonardo Da Vinci. At the same time I see art I doesn't like as art. I don't enjoy many of the art pieces that were made in the modernism genre and especially not the Dada movement. Often it's lacking elements like harmony, details and colors that fits well - so it doesn't look as aesthetically pleasing, in addition to having no meaning. I would still argue it's art because of although it looks poorly executed, it was still an idea and the artist created something. In some art genre it's the concept of coming up with an idea itself and doing it before someone else are doing it that is the point, not the beauty and meaning.


TL;DR: I think all man made ideas that are executed are a form of art, but not all art is good art.